In Maryland, medical malpractice experts who changed their testimony from deposition were subject to Daubert exclusion.
Continue reading ›Mark Kopec Now
In Maryland, medical malpractice experts who changed their testimony from deposition were subject to Daubert exclusion.
Continue reading ›In Maryland, a plaintiff is entitled to have entry of judgment, and post judgment interest start, nunc pro tunc to the date of verdict.
Continue reading ›In Maryland, a trial court can assign weight to evidence in exercising its discretion to grant a motion for new trial.
Continue reading ›The court can give additional peremptory challenges to multiple defendants if it finds adversity of interest between them.
Continue reading ›Issues were not preserved for appeal when counsel failed to object to questions, after denial of motion in limine.
Continue reading ›Defense counsel’s comments in closing argument on evidence that was not admitted did not prejudice the plaintiff.
Continue reading ›In Maryland, a medical injury requiring filing in HCADRO involves application of a professional standard of care.
Continue reading ›In Maryland, the trial court may exclude a late expert designation when there is not good cause and there is prejudice to the opposing party.
Continue reading ›In Maryland, the trial court has sound discretion to consider a motion for continuance. The review standard is an abuse of discretion.
Continue reading ›