Erroneous summary judgment in favor of one
defendant did not provide a basis to overturn the verdicts in favor of the other defendants.
Mark Kopec Now
Erroneous summary judgment in favor of one
defendant did not provide a basis to overturn the verdicts in favor of the other defendants.
In medical malpractice involving post-endoscopy monitoring, an anesthesiologist expert was a related specialty to a gastroenterologist.
Continue reading ›The one satisfaction rule was not violated by a car accident settlement that occurred after medical malpractice.
Continue reading ›$48M verdict for delay in addressing reoccurrence of skin cancer, failure to biopsy and refer for radiation.
Continue reading ›In Maryland, a circuit court must take evidence in assessing a contested motion enforcing a settlement agreement.
Continue reading ›$15.5 million medical malpractice verdict for misread CT scan that led to plaintiff becoming quadriplegic and ultimately passing.
Continue reading ›CQE & report was sufficient in identifying the defendant through its agents and stated the standard of care and how it was not met.
Continue reading ›$16 Million verdict for medical malpractice infant death. Failure to respond to fetal distress during prolonged labor.
Continue reading ›General Surgeon and internal medicine were related specialties in a CQE for the purpose of examining for decubitus ulcers.
Continue reading ›$16 million verdict for 13-inch retractor left in two months in retained surgical instrument case from tumor removal surgery.
Continue reading ›