Transfer on forum non conveniens was immediately appealable and was not an abuse of discretion on convenience or public interest.
Continue reading ›Mark Kopec Now
Transfer on forum non conveniens was immediately appealable and was not an abuse of discretion on convenience or public interest.
Continue reading ›Plaintiff’s venue choice carries substantial weight in medical malpractice and shouldn’t be disturbed unless factors weigh strongly against.
Continue reading ›Writ of mandamus issued when administrative judge’s vacating of trial judge’s bifurcation order was an unauthorized defacto appellate review.
Continue reading ›A medical malpractice plaintiff whose Certificate of Qualified Expert is declared deficient must return to the HCADRO for refiling.
Continue reading ›Denial of scheduling order amendment was proper after no substantial compliance by failing to timely designate expert.
Continue reading ›A party did not make a prima facie Batson challenge. It did not identify the stricken jurors and proffer a discriminatory purpose.
Continue reading ›Md Rule 2-602(a) allows revision of an order, to grant a motion in limine that the court had previously denied twice.
Continue reading ›A declaration stating there was no response at the door does not meet good faith attempts at service of process before serving SDAT.
Continue reading ›A thorough search of internet and personal connections to find the defendant is required before alternative service can be used.
Continue reading ›Email is proper service of process when conventional methods have failed, and it is reasonably calculated to give the defendant actual notice.
Continue reading ›