Economic Damages: Williams v. Dimensions

Kopec Law Firm

Economic damages in medical malpractice cases are the damages that reimburse the plaintiff for financial costs caused by the medical malpractice. Examples are medical bills and lost wages. The Appellate Court of Maryland issued an unreported opinion on August 28, 2023. The case was Williams v. Dimensions Health Corp. and the issue was economic damages. The focus was on a life care plan. That is a projection of future costs that an injured person will require. I will discuss the case and then provide some commentary for Maryland medical malpractice lawyers.


The plaintiff had been in a single-car accident. As a result, he hit the guard rail and flipped several times. The defendant doctor did a fasciotomy to address compartment syndrome in the plaintiff’s right leg. The plaintiff alleged that the doctor negligently performed the procedure, resulting in an above-the-knee amputation of the leg. (Op. at 3). 

The plaintiff had other severe, permanent injuries from the car accident that were unrelated to the medical malpractice. They included an above-the-knee amputation of the left leg and severe and permanent damage to the left arm. (Id.).

Medical malpractice economic damages
Medical Malpractice Economic Damages

The parties disputed over whether the life care plan was addressing needs and economic damages from the other car accident injuries. They also disagreed on the allocation of the burden of proof.

Plaintiff’s Witnesses

At trial, the plaintiff called five expert witnesses concerning the extent of his injuries and damages. They included an expert in prosthetics and orthotics. An orthopedic expert also testified. If the plaintiff had been treated timely, he probably would have had a leg he could walk on. However, he would have had trouble with recreational activities. (Id. at 5-6).

A physical medicine and rehabilitation expert also testified to the plaintiff’s current and future needs. A life care planner took the testimony of the other experts and created a care plan. (Id. at 6). She calculated the total care the plaintiff would need. She assumed he retained his right leg and subtracted that amount from the total cost of care he now requires. (Id. at 7). Additionally, an economist testified on economic damages that the present value of life care was $6.3-$6.5 million. (Id. at 9).

Defense Witnesses

The defense called four experts. An orthopedic surgeon testified that the right leg would have had nerve damage and constant pain. It would not have been very functional. An expert in prosthetics observed that the plaintiff’s chronic pain keeps him in bed 4-5 times per week. He added that every attempt to use a prosthetic had been unsuccessful so far. As a result, the expert concluded that the plaintiff was not a candidate for prosthetics. (Id. at 10).

The defense life care planner observed that the plaintiff had a nonfunctional left arm from the accident and that the subsequent medical treatment did not cause it. The plaintiff also would have had chronic back and body pain even if he kept his right leg. As a result, the defense expert concluded that the amount of care the plaintiff now needed was no different than the care he would have needed if he kept his leg. (Id. at 10-11).

Court Decision on Economic Damages

The jury found for the plaintiff and awarded over $6.2 million, all of which was economic damages except for $300,000 in non-economic damages.

The parties disputed whether the plaintiff’s injuries were divisible and, if so, who had the burden of showing apportionment of damages.

The Court noted that none of the parties had asked the trial court to determine if the injuries were divisible as a matter of law. The time to do so was at the admission of expert testimony or consideration of jury instructions. (Id. at 43). As a result, the Court did not address divisibility. Instead, it examined the plaintiff’s evidence to see if it was sufficient to support the jury’s award and concluded that it was. (Id. at 49).

Commentary By the Baltimore Medical Malpractice Lawyer

Economic Damages

The plaintiff and the defendant had facts to support their arguments on the plaintiff’s future needs. Even before the additional amputation attributed to the malpractice, the plaintiff had one leg amputation, a severe arm injury, and significant chronic pain. On the other hand, the plaintiff had an expert opinion that the amputation of the plaintiff’s only remaining leg caused him much greater needs than he would have had.

The Williams Court noted that each side had failed to ask the trial court for a ruling as a matter of law in its favor on the issue of divisibility. This observation surely is significant guidance for future cases. But would it have made a difference in this case? 

Based on the expert testimony discussed it would have been unlikely that the Court would have ruled on this issue as a matter of law. The trial court likely would have found that admissible expert testimony was disputed on the issue and would have let the jury decide the question. Therefore, the result would have been the same.

However, Williams is prompting lawyers on both sides to raise the issue of divisibility as a matter of law where appropriate and to address the accompanying burdens in jury instructions.

Mark Kopec is a top-rated Baltimore medical malpractice lawyer. Contact us at 800-604-0704 to speak directly with Attorney Kopec in a free consultation. The Kopec Law Firm is in Baltimore and helps clients throughout Maryland and Washington, D.C. Thank you for reading the Baltimore Medical Malpractice Lawyer Blog.

What Our Clients Say About Us

At the Kopec Law Firm, we are grateful that satisfied clients express their appreciation!

Mark is a knowledgeable and empathetic lawyer who speaks directly and concisely to evaluate your problem. He doesn't use attorney jargon that confuses people, rather he talks clearly. Although he couldn't help me with my situation, the consultation I had was productive because he answered my questions and gave me some clarity.

Shahnaz in Ellicott City

Dear Mark, I just wanted to express my gratitude for your dedication to my case. As you know, it has been a long and upsetting process for me, which would have been a great deal longer had it not been for the hours you put in helping me with this emotional roller coaster. Thank you again.

Shannon T. in Anne Arundel County

Dear Mark, thank you so much for your help and kindness. You provided the guidance and assistance we needed to obtain some understanding in loss of our child. We will never forget the professional and personal service provided. If anyone is in need of legal representation, I will certainly send them your way. God bless.

Kim C. in Cecil County

I wanted to say thank you for spending time with me regarding my questions about legal issues. Mere words cannot really express my gratitude. You seem to truly care about people.

Client in Baltimore City

Dear Mr. Mark, I’m truly grateful to have had you work on my son’s case. You were up front at all times and were on key every step of the way. I will always recommend your firm. Thank you so much for helping my son. P.S. Every time my son sees you on TV, he says “Mom, that’s my lawyer, Mr. Mark.” 🙂 Thank you again. You did an excellent job on the...

K.N. in Baltimore City

Dear Mark, we want to thank you for all the hard work and time your firm put in our case. You took the time to listen to us and research our case. You were honest and up front regarding the case. You responded to questions and concerns quickly. We would highly recommend your firm and services to anyone who is in need of legal representation. We...

Rebecca T. in Prince George’s County

Super Awesome team and staff! Worked with them for a case they handled for my grandchild about 10yrs ago! Would definitely use them again! I recommend them to everyone I know. Could never thank them enough! Very thorough and knowledgeable! Always kept us in the loop throughout the entire process!!!!

Letha C. in Prince George’s County

Mark explained everything in detail and brought clarity to all of my concerns.

Doris in Edgwater

I am very happy and thankful for your help. You responded very quickly. I am very happy to recommend you.

Linda in Chevy Chase
  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Talk to a Lawyer
  3. 3 No Fee Unless You Win
Fill out the contact form or call us at 800-604-0704 to schedule your consultation.

Send Us a Message