It was error to enter judgment after excluding de bene esse depositions. It was not the close of evidence and there was no written motion.
Continue reading ›Mark Kopec Now
It was error to enter judgment after excluding de bene esse depositions. It was not the close of evidence and there was no written motion.
Continue reading ›Medical malpractice plaintiffs submitted sufficient expert causation testimony to establish that earlier action would have prevented injury.
Continue reading ›In Maryland, the right to an extension to file a CQE is mandatory when the three statutory requirements are met.
Continue reading ›Plaintiffs must identify individual medical provider agents in a CQE even when case is only against corporate defendants.
Continue reading ›Plaintiffs’ Revisory motion for discovery sanction in medical malpractice case did not state a procedural irregularity.
Continue reading ›Maryland law reducing medical malpractice bill verdict to amounts actually paid was not preempted by Medicare’s right to reimbursement law.
Continue reading ›In FTCA case, the plaintiff’s failure to specify a sum certain in the Form SF-95 resulted in dismissal without prejudice.
Continue reading ›In Maryland, party’s failure to object to mentioning of insurance resulted in no preservation of the issue for appeal.
Continue reading ›Plaintiff met good cause for amending complaint after deadline when he promptly sought leave after receiving the information.
Continue reading ›Court did not err in giving modified Allen charge and limiting deliberations to one hour at the end of the last day of trial.
Continue reading ›