Late motions to compel filed three months after discovery failures were not submitted with reasonable promptness under Maryland Rule 2-432(d).
Continue reading ›Mark Kopec Now
Late motions to compel filed three months after discovery failures were not submitted with reasonable promptness under Maryland Rule 2-432(d).
Continue reading ›The Appellate Court will rarely disturb a denial of summary judgment, particularly when the issue is good faith in reporter immunity.
Continue reading ›Failure to identify meeting witness was discovery violation. “Occurrence” in interrogatory was broadly construed.
Continue reading ›A prenuptial fee-sharing agreement is enforceable if it does not restrict practice and is a reasonable attempt to forecast quantum meruit.
Continue reading ›Where a notice of appeal is filed more than 30 days after judgment, the scope of appeal is only from denial of the post-trial motion.
Continue reading ›In Maryland, a registered nurse can opine on causation in a Certificate of Qualified Expert (Nurse CQE) in a decubitus ulcer case.
Continue reading ›In Maryland, medical malpractice experts who changed their testimony from deposition were subject to Daubert exclusion.
Continue reading ›In Maryland, a plaintiff is entitled to have entry of judgment, and post judgment interest start, nunc pro tunc to the date of verdict.
Continue reading ›Mall owner and management company had separate duties and were each joint tortfeasors under settlement agreement.
Continue reading ›The Maryland statute of limitations savings clause in CJP 3-2A-04(b)(4)(iv) applies only to the 25% rule, and not all of section (b).
Continue reading ›