Subsequent Negligence: Browne v. State Farm

Kopec Law Firm

A complicated situation arises when someone hurt by negligence becomes a victim of subsequent negligence. An example is a car accident victim who then experiences medical malpractice. I will discuss a Maryland case on this topic and then provide some practice tips for Maryland medical malpractice lawyers.

The Appellate Court of Maryland issued a published opinion in the case of Browne v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. on July 27, 2023. The Court dealt with the procedures for a lack of good faith claim by an insured against the insurance company. (Op. at 1). This post focuses on the Court’s guidance on subsequent negligent treatment. The case involved an automobile accident. Afterward, the at-fault driver fled the scene. (Id. at 2). 

Medical malpractice
Medical malpractice

The plaintiff’s complaints included lower back pain. An MRI specifically revealed a Tarlov Cyst along the sacral nerve roots and a protruding disc at L4-L5. (Id. at 4). She subsequently had surgery to remove the cyst. (Id. at 5). The plaintiff submitted doctor testimony that the accident aggravated the cyst and necessitated the surgery. The insurer’s doctor opined that the cyst was unrelated to the accident. The doctor also concluded that the surgery made her injuries worse (Id. at 6).

The Court noted that its analysis involved two doctrines. One is the subsequent negligence doctrine. The other is the law requiring medical bills to be fair, reasonable, and necessary to be recoverable. The Browne case is the first reported case in Maryland discussing the interplay between these two. (Id. at 22). 

Subsequent Negligence Doctrine

The subsequent negligence doctrine extends a tortfeasor’s liability for negligence that occurs after the tort. If the negligent actor is liable for another’s bodily injury, then he may be responsible for any additional physical harm. That liability occurs from normal efforts of third persons rendering aid, which the other’s injury reasonably requires. The liability is irrespective of whether such acts are proper or negligent. (Id.)

Principles of proximate causation constrain the extent of the liability. An actor’s negligent conduct is a legal cause of harm to another if:

(a) his conduct is a substantial factor in bringing about the harm and

(2) no rule of law relieves the actor from liability.

The question is whether the original tortfeasor should have foreseen the general harm. The issue is not the specific manifestation of that harm. (Id. at 23-24).

The original tortfeasor is released from liability only if the intervening negligent act or omission is considered a superseding cause. (Id. at 24). An original tortfeasor will remain liable. The exception is if it is unforeseeable that medical professionals would perform this type of medical negligent treatment. Another exception is if the kind of medical mistake is outside the realm of ordinary human fallibility. (Id. at 30). Specifically, examples of injuries beyond the scope of liability include:

(1) extraordinary misconduct by medical professionals;

(2) intentional torts committed by medical professionals against the victim;

(3) a victim’s elected treatment of an ailment known to be unrelated to the injuries caused by the negligent actor;

(4) treatment by a medical professional the victim was negligent in selecting

and (5) aggravation of the injury due to the victim’s negligence in treating her injuries. (Id. at 35).

The “Necessary” Requirement

The Court then turned to the rule that medical bills be fair, reasonable, and necessary. It examined the allocation of liability to an original tortfeasor when a doctor negligently provides subsequent medical treatment. (Id. at 40). In this context, “necessary” means “causally related” or “proximately resulted from” the original tort. A defendant may not avoid liability by arguing that the doctor only performed the treatment because of a negligent misdiagnosis. (Id. at 49).

The defense has the burden of showing that the subsequent medical provider’s negligence was a superseding cause. The defendant must show that the negligence was so extraordinary or unusual that it constituted a superseding cause. (Id. at 51)

The five factors discussed above apply to this analysis. The defendant must produce admissible evidence supporting these five assertions, tending to negate the causation element. In contrast, the ultimate burden of persuasion on that element remains with the plaintiff. The plaintiff must use expert testimony for any issue beyond layperson jurors’ general knowledge and comprehension. (Id. at 53-54).

Commentary By the Baltimore Medical Malpractice Lawyer

Practice Tips

When two different actors injure a client, it can become a tricky legal situation. First, there is the lawyer that the client may consult for the car accident case. The car accident lawyer should assess whether the car accident defendant may be responsible for the subsequent medical malpractice. If so, the car accident lawyer will consider the expert testimony needed to support that claim. Suppose the car accident lawyer settles the case. The lawyer then must be careful about the language in the release given to the person who caused the car accident. He must ensure that the persons responsible for the medical malpractice are not released. Using language that does not impair the medical malpractice claim is good practice. Specifically, add language preserving the claims against all potential medical malpractice defendants.

The Maryland medical malpractice lawyer also must exercise care. The lawyer must inquire whether there is any claim against the person who caused the car accident. The medical malpractice lawyer will certainly want to know whether such a case remains open. Also, the lawyer should question whether it includes a claim for medical malpractice injuries. Suppose the plaintiff has already settled the car accident claim. Then, the Maryland medical malpractice lawyer must examine the release to assess whether the plaintiff has preserved claims against the medical malpractice defendants.

Mark Kopec is a top-rated Baltimore medical malpractice lawyer. Contact us at 800-604-0704 to speak directly with Attorney Kopec in a free consultation. The Kopec Law Firm is in Baltimore and helps clients throughout Maryland and Washington, D.C. Thank you for reading the Baltimore Medical Malpractice Lawyer Blog.

What Our Clients Say About Us

At the Kopec Law Firm, we are grateful that satisfied clients express their appreciation!

Mark is a knowledgeable and empathetic lawyer who speaks directly and concisely to evaluate your problem. He doesn't use attorney jargon that confuses people, rather he talks clearly. Although he couldn't help me with my situation, the consultation I had was productive because he answered my questions and gave me some clarity.

Shahnaz in Ellicott City

Dear Mark, I just wanted to express my gratitude for your dedication to my case. As you know, it has been a long and upsetting process for me, which would have been a great deal longer had it not been for the hours you put in helping me with this emotional roller coaster. Thank you again.

Shannon T. in Anne Arundel County

Dear Mark, thank you so much for your help and kindness. You provided the guidance and assistance we needed to obtain some understanding in loss of our child. We will never forget the professional and personal service provided. If anyone is in need of legal representation, I will certainly send them your way. God bless.

Kim C. in Cecil County

I wanted to say thank you for spending time with me regarding my questions about legal issues. Mere words cannot really express my gratitude. You seem to truly care about people.

Client in Baltimore City

Dear Mr. Mark, I’m truly grateful to have had you work on my son’s case. You were up front at all times and were on key every step of the way. I will always recommend your firm. Thank you so much for helping my son. P.S. Every time my son sees you on TV, he says “Mom, that’s my lawyer, Mr. Mark.” 🙂 Thank you again. You did an excellent job on the...

K.N. in Baltimore City

Dear Mark, we want to thank you for all the hard work and time your firm put in our case. You took the time to listen to us and research our case. You were honest and up front regarding the case. You responded to questions and concerns quickly. We would highly recommend your firm and services to anyone who is in need of legal representation. We...

Rebecca T. in Prince George’s County

Super Awesome team and staff! Worked with them for a case they handled for my grandchild about 10yrs ago! Would definitely use them again! I recommend them to everyone I know. Could never thank them enough! Very thorough and knowledgeable! Always kept us in the loop throughout the entire process!!!!

Letha C. in Prince George’s County

Mark explained everything in detail and brought clarity to all of my concerns.

Doris in Edgwater

I am very happy and thankful for your help. You responded very quickly. I am very happy to recommend you.

Linda in Chevy Chase
  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Talk to a Lawyer
  3. 3 No Fee Unless You Win
Fill out the contact form or call us at 800-604-0704 to schedule your consultation.

Send Us a Message