Urinary Incontinence

⚖️ Medical Malpractice and the Hidden Scars of Urinary Incontinence

Urinary incontinence is the involuntary leakage of urine. It is a prevalent and often devastating condition that severely diminishes a person’s quality of life. While urinary incontinence can arise from natural causes, it is a significant focus in medical malpractice litigation when it results from a healthcare provider’s negligence, particularly during surgery or due to diagnostic failures. This article explores the anatomy involved, the medical conditions and procedures where malpractice may occur, the resulting incontinence, and the available treatments.


🧍 Anatomy of the Urinary System

The urinary system is a complex collection of organs responsible for filtering waste from the blood and excreting it as urine. Understanding its structure is crucial to grasping how injury can lead to incontinence.

  • Kidneys: Two bean-shaped organs that filter waste (urea) and excess fluid from the blood, producing urine.
  • Ureters: Two narrow tubes that transport urine from the kidneys to the bladder.
  • Bladder: A hollow, muscular, balloon-shaped organ located in the pelvis that stores urine. The bladder wall relaxes to store urine and contracts to empty it.
  • Urethra: A tube leading from the bottom of the bladder to the outside of the body, allowing urine to exit during urination.
  • Sphincter Muscles: A group of muscles, including the internal sphincter (at the bladder neck) and the external sphincter (surrounding the urethra), that must tightly close to prevent leakage.
  • Pelvic Floor Muscles: A “sling” of muscles that supports the bladder and urethra, contributing significantly to continence, especially under stress (coughing, sneezing).
Urinary Incontinence & Medical Malpractice
Urinary Incontinence & Medical Malpractice

Normal urination involves a coordinated effort: the bladder muscle (detrusor) contracts, while the sphincter and pelvic floor muscles relax. Any injury or dysfunction to these structures—the bladder, urethra, sphincters, or their controlling nerves—can cause incontinence.


🏥 Medical Malpractice Scenarios Leading to Urinary Incontinence

Medical negligence leading to urinary incontinence typically falls into two categories: surgical errors that directly damage the urinary tract or nerves, and misdiagnosis failures that miss a reversible cause or underlying pathology.

1. Surgical Injury During Hysterectomy or Pelvic Procedures

ComponentDescription
Medical ConditionUterine Fibroids, Endometriosis, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, or Uterine Cancer.
Type of DoctorGynecologist or General Surgeon.
Test That Should Have Been ConductedPre-operative Imaging (e.g., CT scan, MRI) or Cystoscopy (before or during the procedure). These tests help visualize the ureters’ and bladder’s proximity to the surgical field, especially in cases of extensive scarring or anatomical distortion.
Type of ProcedureHysterectomy (removal of the uterus), often performed to treat the above conditions.
Procedure Details & Resulting IncontinenceA hysterectomy involves operating near the bladder and ureters. Due to the proximity of these organs, a careless or unskillful surgeon may cause • a Ureter Injury: The ureters are often mistaken for blood vessels or clamped and cut, or unintentionally sutured, causing a ureteral obstruction. This blocks urine flow, leading to urine pooling, kidney damage, and, if the injury goes undetected, the formation of a urinary fistula (an abnormal connection, often between the bladder/ureter and the vagina—a vesicovaginal or ureterovaginal fistula). • Bladder Perforation/Injury: The bladder can be mistakenly cut, leading to a fistula or other defect.
How Incontinence ResultsA urinary fistula results in constant, passive leakage of urine from the vagina, a severe form of incontinence. An unrecognized ureteral injury or obstruction can lead to kidney damage and life-threatening infection (sepsis) from urine leakage into the abdominal cavity, though its connection to incontinence is primarily through the formation of a fistula.

2. Negligent Management of Prostate Surgery

ComponentDescription
Medical ConditionProstate Cancer or Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH).
Type of DoctorUrologist.
Test That Should Have Been ConductedPre-operative Urodynamic Study (to assess bladder function and urethral resistance) and Thorough Counseling/Informed Consent about the high risk of incontinence.
Type of ProcedureRadical Prostatectomy (removal of the entire prostate for cancer) or Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) (removing excess prostate tissue for BPH).
Procedure Details & Resulting IncontinenceBoth procedures take place in an area crucial for continence. The prostate surrounds the urethra and sits near the internal and external sphincter muscles. • Sphincter Damage: During Radical Prostatectomy, the external urethral sphincter is particularly vulnerable. Malpractice can involve negligent surgical technique that causes excessive damage or removes more tissue than necessary from the sphincter. • Bladder Neck Contracture: A complication after TURP, where the surgical site scars and narrows the bladder neck, leading to overflow incontinence or urinary retention.
How Incontinence ResultsDamage to the sphincter muscles, particularly the external one, results in Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI), where urine leaks during physical activity like coughing, sneezing, or lifting. Severe nerve damage during the prostatectomy can also lead to impaired bladder function and mixed incontinence.

3. Failure to Diagnose Urological Cancer or Obstruction

ComponentDescription
Medical ConditionBladder Cancer, Prostate Cancer, or Severe Urethral Stricture.
Type of DoctorPrimary Care Physician or Urologist.
Test That Should Have Been ConductedUrinalysis, Urine Culture, Cystoscopy (for hematuria or persistent symptoms), and Imaging (e.g., CT or MRI).
Procedure Details & Resulting IncontinenceA patient presents with persistent symptoms (e.g., blood in urine (hematuria), pain, frequent or urgent urination, difficulty starting the stream), which the doctor dismisses as a minor infection or “old age.” • Failure to Test: The doctor fails to order a cystoscopy to directly visualize the bladder lining or proper imaging to detect a mass or significant obstruction.
How Incontinence ResultsDelay in Diagnosis allows the cancer or obstruction to progress. A large tumor or severe, untreated obstruction can impair the bladder’s ability to empty completely, leading to chronic overdistension and muscle damage. This results in Overflow Incontinence, where the bladder is constantly full, and urine dribbles out. Advanced cancer can also directly invade the sphincter muscles, leading to severe incontinence.

🩹 Treatments for Medical Malpractice Urinary Incontinence and Effectiveness

The type of treatment depends on the type of incontinence (Stress, Urge, Overflow, or Mixed) and the underlying cause. Many non-surgical treatments are often highly effective and are typically tried first.

1. Conservative and Behavioral Therapies

  • Pelvic Floor Muscle Training (Kegel Exercises): This is the first-line treatment for Stress Incontinence and a component of therapy for other types. It aims to strengthen the muscles that support the urethra and bladder.
    • Effectiveness: Highly effective, often resulting in a 50% to 75% reduction in leakage episodes, and potentially curative for mild to moderate SUI. Success relies heavily on proper technique and patient adherence.
  • Bladder Training: Used primarily for Urge Incontinence, this involves gradually increasing the time between trips to the bathroom to help the bladder hold more urine and suppress urgency.
    • Effectiveness: Very effective, potentially better than medication in some studies for urge incontinence, with reported cure or improvement in over 50% of patients.

2. Medications

  • Anticholinergics/Beta-3 Agonists: Prescribed for Urge Incontinence (Overactive Bladder). They relax the bladder muscle (detrusor), increasing its capacity and reducing involuntary contractions.
    • Effectiveness: Generally effective at reducing the frequency and severity of urgency and leakage, often by 50% or more, though side effects like dry mouth and constipation are common.
  • Duloxetine (SNRI): Occasionally used for Stress Incontinence. It increases the muscle tone of the urethral sphincter.
    • Effectiveness: Moderate, generally considered only when non-surgical options fail and before resorting to surgery.

3. Surgical and Interventional Procedures

  • Mid-Urethral Sling Procedure: The gold standard for treating female Stress Incontinence. A synthetic mesh or tissue strip is placed under the urethra to provide support and keep it closed during physical stress.
    • Effectiveness: Highly effective, with cure or significant improvement rates often exceeding 85-90%. It is, however, the most frequently litigated procedure in SUI malpractice cases due to potential complications like mesh erosion, pain, or de novo urge incontinence.
  • Artificial Urinary Sphincter (AUS): Primarily for men with severe Stress Incontinence following prostate surgery. A device is implanted to keep the urethra closed until the patient deflates it to urinate.
    • Effectiveness: Considered the most effective surgical option for severe post-prostatectomy SUI, with high patient satisfaction and continence rates.
  • Botox (OnabotulinumtoxinA) Injections: Injected into the bladder muscle to treat severe Urge Incontinence that hasn’t responded to medications. It temporarily paralyzes the detrusor muscle.
    • Effectiveness: Very effective for severe cases, offering significant relief, but requires repeat injections (typically every 6-9 months) and carries a risk of temporary urinary retention.

🚨 The Medical Malpractice Standard of Care & Urinary Incontinence

A claim for medical malpractice involving urinary incontinence rests on proving that the physician’s care fell below the accepted standard of care for the profession, and this negligence directly caused the patient’s injury (incontinence). This could involve:

  1. Negligent Surgical Performance: Causing direct, avoidable injury to the bladder, ureters, or sphincter muscles during a procedure.
  2. Failure to Obtain Informed Consent: Not adequately informing the patient of the risk of severe and permanent incontinence before a procedure, especially one known to be high-risk (like prostatectomy).
  3. Failure to Diagnose: Ignoring clear signs, such as persistent hematuria or severe obstructive symptoms, leading to a condition (like advanced cancer or severe overdistension) that permanently damages the urinary tract’s function.

Urinary incontinence is more than a physical ailment; it is a profoundly personal and psychological injury. When it results from medical negligence, victims are entitled to seek compensation for their long-term suffering, medical expenses, and loss of quality of life.

If you have urinary incontinence from medical malpractice, then visit our free consultation page or video. Then contact the Kopec Law Firm at 800-604-0704 to speak directly with Attorney Mark Kopec. He is a top-rated Baltimore medical malpractice lawyer. The Kopec Law Firm is in Baltimore and pursues cases throughout Maryland and Washington, D.C.

What Our Clients Say About Us

At the Kopec Law Firm, we are grateful that satisfied clients express their appreciation!

Mark is a knowledgeable and empathetic lawyer who speaks directly and concisely to evaluate your problem. He doesn't use attorney jargon that confuses people, rather he talks clearly. Although he couldn't help me with my situation, the consultation I had was productive because he answered my questions and gave me some clarity.

Shahnaz in Ellicott City

Dear Mark, I just wanted to express my gratitude for your dedication to my case. As you know, it has been a long and upsetting process for me, which would have been a great deal longer had it not been for the hours you put in helping me with this emotional roller coaster. Thank you again.

Shannon T. in Anne Arundel County

Dear Mark, thank you so much for your help and kindness. You provided the guidance and assistance we needed to obtain some understanding in loss of our child. We will never forget the professional and personal service provided. If anyone is in need of legal representation, I will certainly send them your way. God bless.

Kim C. in Cecil County

I wanted to say thank you for spending time with me regarding my questions about legal issues. Mere words cannot really express my gratitude. You seem to truly care about people.

Client in Baltimore City

Dear Mr. Mark, I’m truly grateful to have had you work on my son’s case. You were up front at all times and were on key every step of the way. I will always recommend your firm. Thank you so much for helping my son. P.S. Every time my son sees you on TV, he says “Mom, that’s my lawyer, Mr. Mark.” 🙂 Thank you again. You did an excellent job on the...

K.N. in Baltimore City

Dear Mark, we want to thank you for all the hard work and time your firm put in our case. You took the time to listen to us and research our case. You were honest and up front regarding the case. You responded to questions and concerns quickly. We would highly recommend your firm and services to anyone who is in need of legal representation. We...

Rebecca T. in Prince George’s County

Super Awesome team and staff! Worked with them for a case they handled for my grandchild about 10yrs ago! Would definitely use them again! I recommend them to everyone I know. Could never thank them enough! Very thorough and knowledgeable! Always kept us in the loop throughout the entire process!!!!

Letha C. in Prince George’s County

Mark explained everything in detail and brought clarity to all of my concerns.

Doris in Edgwater

I am very happy and thankful for your help. You responded very quickly. I am very happy to recommend you.

Linda in Chevy Chase
  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Talk to a Lawyer
  3. 3 No Fee Unless You Win
Fill out the contact form or call us at 800-604-0704 to schedule your consultation.

Send Us a Message